The Stain Files

Method and evidence

How the files are made and reviewed

A generated household reference with explicit care limits. The sources below support general principles; they do not validate every possible stain, product and material combination.

Where the content came from

The original stain descriptions, material traits and treatment rules were authored by an AI assistant on 23 October 2026. They were not imported from a validated experimental stain-removal dataset. A separate AI agent checked selected claims against web sources and reported 28 corrections. That was not a documented human textile-specialist review or an individual review of every finished article.

What a file represents

The generator combines 70 stain entries with 29 material profiles. Component weights describe editorial treatment categories, not measured chemical concentrations. For example, labelling blood as a protein-containing stain does not mean that blood is mostly protein: whole blood contains substantial water and other constituents. Products such as coffee drinks, cosmetics, paints and sunscreens vary in composition.

Material profiles are general categories. They cannot identify a garment lining, coating, unstable dye, furniture backing, electronic seat component or specific stone sealer. The item care label and the exact product directions control whether a step is appropriate. A missing prohibition in this model is not proof of compatibility.

What the current review establishes

On 31 October 2026 an AI-assisted audit examined the shared records and templates, checked selected claims against the references below, corrected identified problems, and ran consistency checks over every generated HTML page and all stain/material plans. Remaining unsupported statements are recorded in the project audit ledger. This does not establish that every scientific statement or exact treatment combination has been independently verified.

There are no documented garment experiments behind the difficulty scores, success expectations or hands-on times. Scores are editorial estimates. Contact times, concentrations and temperatures must come from the compatible product and item labels, not from a score or short illustration. A general source can support cold-water treatment for blood without establishing a particular homemade recipe for every silk dye and finish.

Before using any treatment

Understanding the ratings

“Test first” means compatibility still needs checking; “avoid” and “never” identify restrictions or damage risks. An editorial difficulty rating describes the general challenge and is not a measured probability of removal. No rating promises that a stain will disappear or that repeated treatment is safe.

Illustrations and social summaries

Images and browser-generated videos are diagrams, not photographs of real stains or observed cleaning outcomes. A short card omits context: read the full file and sources before treatment. Social kits rendered before the October 31 audit are historical drafts and need regeneration and review before publication.

References checked in this review

Limits and corrections

Source guidance can differ by product or professional setting. This reference is not a laboratory validation, safety certification, disinfection protocol or medical service. If a source does not cover the actual item or product, do not assume a substitute is suitable. For suspected poisoning, follow product first-aid directions and contact a poison centre; severe symptoms require emergency services. Report corrections with the exact page, item, product and supporting source.